Expressions of Faith

an outlet of encouragement, explanation, and exhortation

Page 23 of 24

I have spread my dreams under your feet…

I listened to a TED talk by Ken Robinson this evening who quoted a poem by W.B. Yeats, He Wishes For the Cloths of Heaven.

HAD I the heavens’ embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.

Robinson referred his listeners to children who relate to adults by spreading their dreams beneath our feet. It seemed to me a fitting consideration for all of our significant relationships. The more significant, the more dreams are exposed to tread. And so I’m sharing it with you. One furthering of the idea, perhaps… Is it central to the ideal of hospitality to tread lightly on others dreams? I have spread my dreams under your feet.

Addendum. A couple of weeks ago, a group of us from church ate at our favorite hamburger joint after a softball game. Four of us sat with my granddaughter Kylie, who is three years old and, in her words, almost grown up now. Her father likes to put a packet of pepper into his ketchup and dip his fries. Kylie the almost-grown-up-3-year-old likes this flavor and likes to imitate this very grown up habit (along with eating Thai Chili-Lime Cashews from Trader Joe’s, but that’s another story). So, mingling with us other grownups she casually picked up a packet and emptied it into her ketchup. Unfortunately, it was salt instead of pepper. The four of us “grownups” at the table all instinctively reached out and spoke up to try to stop her mistake – that’s not pepper! – startling her from her nearly grown-up reverie. We were too late. Someone picked up the ketchup and attempted to shake the salt from the top. Kylie shrank back. After a time, she started crying uncontrollably. We all felt bad. No had spoken in anger. It was just that we stepped all over her dream of being grown up, and she was terribly embarrassed. The petals of the blossoming rose retracted a bit. Could we have that little episode back to do over?

Hope

Esther asked: “What is hope? What does it mean to have hope? How does one come to have hope?”

I really like the way the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament defines the Old Testament idea of hope. Hope is expecting something good. It is related to trust and yearning, but is very different from fear. According to Ecclesiastes 9:4, hope is associated with life. That is, so long as there is life, there is hope!

“The life of the righteous is grounded in a hope that implies a future because its point of reference is God. To hope is to trust. It is demanded even in good times. It is not our own projection but confidence in what God will do. God is our hope (Jer. 17:7).”

The idea is that things are messed up now, but in the “eschatological future” things will be as they should be… because of God, that is. Hope is fundamentally a statement of belief in God’s character, purpose, and love for us. It is fulfilled in the new creation.

I was having difficulty nailing down the difference between hope and faith. Martin Luther, in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians to the rescue:

Faith and hope are so closely linked that they cannot be separated. Still there is a difference between them.

First, hope and faith differ in regard to their sources. Faith originates in the understanding, while hope rises in the will.

Secondly, they differ in regard to their functions. Faith says what is to be done. Faith teaches, describes, directs. Hope exhorts the mind to be strong and courageous.

Thirdly, they differ in regard to their objectives. Faith concentrates on the truth. Hope looks to the goodness of God.

Fourthly, they differ in sequence. Faith is the beginning of life before tribulation. (Hebrews 11.) Hope comes later and is born of tribulation. (Romans 5.)

Fifthly, they differ in regard to their effects. Faith is a judge. It judges errors. Hope is a soldier. It fights against tribulations, the cross, despondency, despair, and waits for better things to come in the midst of evil.

Without hope faith cannot endure. On the other hand, hope without faith is blind rashness and arrogance because it lacks knowledge. Before anything else a Christian must have the insight of faith, so that the intellect may know its directions in the day of trouble and the heart may hope for better things. By faith we begin, by hope we continue.

I was pondering all this when I ran across a quotation from Heretics by G.K. Chesterton in the blog Every Thought Captive. I had forgotten it entirely, I think!

Hope is the power of being cheerful in circumstances which we know to be desperate. It is true that there is a state of hope which belongs to bright prospects and the morning; but that is not the virtue of hope. The virtue of hope exists only in earthquake and, eclipse.

And later, this:

For practical purposes it is at the hopeless moment that we require the hopeful man, and the virtue either does not exist at all, or begins to exist at that moment. Exactly at the instant when hope ceases to be reasonable it begins to be useful.

Well, I’m not sure that hope is necessarily cheerful, but I think whatever it is, it is in spite of immediate circumstances. The whole idea of hope hinges on the fact that the moment seems hopeless!

I’m working through the thought that faith is fundamentally a matter of reason and hope a matter of the will. I understand the point, but wonder if faith and hope may not be a gift. Of course, faith is listed as a gift of the spirit. I wonder of hope is not there with faith, as a gift. As Luther says, they cannot be separated. In my case, I believe I have the gift of faith. It is a pure gift. I mean to say that it is based upon no particular characteristic of my personality or talents. It is, rather, based upon the fact that God has spoken to me. So I have faith regarding that which he has spoken. It has not been based upon circumstances or my discernment of potential. It is, purely and simply, from clarity in what God has said and rooted in my experience of him.

(Aside: humanly speaking, hope is related to discernment of circumstances. That is, we look at the wreckage that causes us doubt about the future, and see potential for change that is reason for hope. Christian hope is not in seeing such potential; it is in seeing God and trusting him.)

How does one get hope? Fundamentally, I don’t think we can get this kind of hope on our own. Jesus is the one who said “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.” God draws us to Jesus, we respond in faith, and hope is born. I don’t see hope in the Christian sense outside of that. Once we are in Christ, then we come to know him and love him and hope is the natural result. Losing ultimate hope would be akin to doubting Christ and his love for us. Hope is knowing that because Jesus is Lord and because he loves us that things will turn out right even when we can see no reason (other than him) to think this will be the outcome.

Just to complete the circuit, it seems appropriate to note that praying and fasting would be a good Christian response to starting to doubt – losing hope. As hope diminishes, prayer and fasting may lead us back into his presence, and thereby into hope. There is no guarantee that one’s subjective perception of hope will increase – just a seeking after the Lord. When we experience him, hope returns. Sometimes it may be after a “dark night of the soul”; I’ll leave writing on that to others more experienced than I. And prayer and fasting is an appropriate response to desperate situations even when we retain ultimate hope in Christ. We may still go to him for hope regarding what comes in this life.

Fasting

Esther asked: “Is there an appropriate way/time to approach fasting? What was it traditionally for? What is it for in the modern day?”

Nine days. That’s how long it takes me to think of what I’d like to say in response to Esther’s excellent questions.

I found myself starting by thinking to myself what fasting is not. It is not a way to control God. That is, people (rightly) think of fasting in times of trouble. What would not be right is to imagine that if we fast long and hard enough that this will convince God to do what we want him to do. Rather, I think fasting in this sort of situation is a way to express that we are concerned beyond the normal concerns of life, so much so that we are forgoing the normal activity of life, even eating! It’s a way of expressing that normal human action is not going to suffice to deal with whatever the situation is, that the situation so has our attention and focus that eating isn’t in the picture. Ideally, we’d be using our extra focus to reach out to God and ask him to intervene. We might be showing our contrition or helplessness or need. For example, in biblical times, people fasted when a massive army was on the way to attack. Or when some other calamity was coming – particularly when the calamity was prophesied as the consequence of sin. The repentant or righteous would fast and pray for forgiveness, agreeing with God in his view of the sin. So fasting in the face of dire circumstances or in repentance from sin is a normal biblical phenomenon.

Another thing that fasting is not is a way to impress onlookers as to one’s religiosity. Jesus was pretty harsh on this tendency that we have to do things like fasting in order to impress others and appear to be holy. His counsel? Don’t do it. When you fast, do it in secret and dress nice so others can’t tell you are fasting. And more to the point, fasting is no substitute for obedience. Fasting will not make one right with God when one remains in sin.

So much for the via negativa. What is the right time and way to approach fasting today? (I mean, besides when the Assyrians are on the horizon.) Consider this. In our times, I think busyness is one of the most damaging enemies of spirituality. It may be that we are caught up in the mundane or even the profane. Or it may be that we are so caught up in ministry that we have little time to focus on God. Either way, praying and fasting can be a way to restore proper focus on our Lord. It’s not magic. It is a discipline that even Jesus undertook at the beginning of his ministry (see Matthew 4). I get the sense that Jesus knew that his life was about to change, and that he wanted to make sure that he was close to his Father in advance of that change. There was focus, and devotion, and probably more than that. Similarly, Paul and Barnabas were set aside as missionaries during a period of prayer and fasting (Acts 13:2). I’m not sure if they were making themselves available to focus on God without a sense of the import of the moment or if they had some idea that something was coming up and sought God for direction. Either way, the praying and fasting is a way of bringing focus away from the every day stuff of life and onto our father God.

Then, it says that after they prayed and fasted (Acts 13:3), the others laid their hands on them and sent them on their way. I get the impression that the time of prayer and fasting was to confirm God’s call on Paul and Barnabas. Again, the others were making themselves available to God – focus – and God confirmed his direction. Later, as they appoint elders, Paul and Barnabas pray and fast (Acts 14:23). So it seems like there is something about prayer and fasting before God in order to make good decisions.

Wrapping it up, it seems to me that fasting is a way of humbling oneself. I don’t think it is really different in modern times than ancient times other than perhaps we are less in tune these days with what we lack in a time of material wealth and distraction. Fasting is not celebration; Jesus said his disciples wouldn’t be fasting while he was with them – they’d be fasting later when he was gone. (See Matthew 9:14-15.) There’s a time for partying and a time for mourning. Fasting is more associated with the mourning that comes from being in that now-but-not-yet time before Jesus returns and sets everything right. I’m thinking there won’t be much fasting in the new heaven and new earth after the resurrection, because the occasion for fasting will be long gone. There are times in this age that are shadows of the celebration time to come, and times that are clearly associated with the not yet. Fasting is an acknowledgment of what is not yet, but should be and will be. It’s us groaning with creation in anticipation of what we hope for. (…which brings me to Esther’s first question, but that’s another response.)

An Introduction to Theodicy, or How can there be so much evil if God is so good?

I highly recommend Ric Machuga’s article in the March/April issue of Books & Culture. Machuga introduces the idea of theodicy in a brief article, summarizing historical and recent attempts to explain why, if God is so good, there is evil in the world. The article is clear, concise, and very helpful for a popular audience. He explains deep concepts in a very readable way. Hopefully booksandculture.com won’t make you pay anything to read the article online. An issue of B&C with the paper version should be in the LBFC library later today, just in case. Email me if you have problems and want to read the article.

Engaging the world on faith’s terms

The following quotation is from Joseph Bottum in First Things, 2010-01 issue. The last paragraph contains a comment I mentioned to one or more of you, and the comment itself is about the book that I think would be good to read together. Quoting:

In 2008 our friend John G. Stackhouse, professor of theology and culture at Regent College, published a book we would have done well to take note of at the time: Making the Best of It: Following Christ in the Real World (Oxford University Press). As the title suggests, Stackhouse addresses Christian engagement with culture as always both unavoidable and provisional, an engagement “for the time being.” Thus, as Miroslav Volf has pointed out, Stackhouse steers between the Scylla of “a whole-scale transformation of the world” and the Charybdis of “building alternative enclaves in the world.” Since neither is realistic in any case, what does Stackhouse think is realistic?

The book proceeds largely by imaginative dialogue with such twentieth-century Protestant luminaries as C.S. Lewis, Reinhold Niebuhr, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer—drawing, along the way, on H. Richard Niebuhr’s famous “five ways” of relating Christ to culture. Brisk and blunt, Making the Best of It yields what Stackhouse describes as his own “hybrid” between “Christ the transformer of culture” and “Christ and culture in paradox.” Sometimes Christians will transform culture, and sometimes they will have to be countercultural—and often they will have to do both. That is the creative tension of Christianity in the world, which cannot be resolved until the end time.

This won’t satisfy those convinced that answers are easy, but its evident fidelity to what C.S. Lewis would have recognized as the Great Tradition may enable us to distinguish between engaging the world on faith’s terms, which is the disciple’s task, and engaging faith on the world’s terms, which is merely the project of religion’s cultured despisers.

Working out how to engage the world on faith’s terms without slipping into engaging faith on the world’s terms seems like an increasingly important thing to me these days, with our increased interaction with and cooperation with non-profit and government organizations.

What about baptism and communion?

Being from the Friends tradition, and staying with it (which is not true of all Evangelical Friends), we’re often asked about our practice of baptism and communion. These days not too many Christians are aware of church history at all, let alone Quakers. They are surprised to find out that otherwise perfectly fine-seeming Christians are not practicing water baptism or communion with the elements! And so they ask perfectly reasonable questions. Hopefully I can answer some of those questions here.

Similarly, there are those members of LBFC who are asked these questions and are not sure how to answer. “What do I say?!” “Will they think we’re a cult or something?” “We don’t want to come across as saying that we are somehow spiritually superior!” Perhaps this essay can help you prepare for those questions.

Being something of a literalist, I am often taken aback when people say that Quakers don’t believe in baptism or communion. That’s simply not true. What Friends believe is that water baptism is a symbol of real immersion in Christ and that communion with elements (a fancy name for the bread and grape juice in this context) is a symbol of the real nourishment we receive from spiritual communion with Christ. Some Quakers literally think of Christ’s shed blood and broken body each time they eat a meal, treating it as a love feast or symbol of communion. So, I would say, we believe strongly in baptism and communion. So strongly, in fact, that we are unwilling to let the symbols interfere with celebrating the reality. We believe that God has called us to the testimony that Christ is all that we need – that no ritual can add to or substitute for what Christ has given us in himself. (See 2 Peter 1:3-11.)

How did we arrive at this testimony? Historically, Friends began as a church renewal movement in England. George Fox preached across Britain and gathered many who encountered the living Christ, calling themselves Friends of Truth or Friends of Light. One of Fox’s God-given messages was that Christians did not need state-sponsored and licensed clergy to stand between them and Christ. In fact, that human standing between Christ and his people was often a hindrance! Christ was available to teach his people himself; a degree from Oxford or Cambridge was no guarantee that one was called by Christ and filled with the Spirit of God. This and other points of the Quaker message angered the authorities and resulted in Friends being thrown out of the Church of England, forbidden to gather for public worship, receive communion, or be baptized in water. All of these rituals were controlled by the state church and forbidden to anyone not licensed by the state church. Of course, nearly everyone in England had already been baptized in water at that time; but only a minority seemed to be following Christ. Quakers realized that this ritual was not a sure sign of one’s standing before God – and neither was the practice of taking communion in the ritual practice of the state church.

While Quakers were quite willing to suffer persecution for disobeying unjust laws, they came to understand that no ritual was the sign that one belongs to Christ. Scripturally speaking, the sign of the new covenant in Christ is a “circumcised heart” (Romans 2:29) and the presence of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:18-25, not any particular ritual. (Also see the ninth and tenth chapter of Hebrews.)

So, Friends simply continued their lives of worship and obedience to Christ without the rituals, enjoying spiritual communion with Christ and being hidden in him – the realities symbolized by the rituals. They endured much persecution and brought much glory to their Lord through their peaceful faithfulness. Our testimony today is intended to stand against superstitious use of rituals to gain God’s approval or make an outward show of piety without inward truth. However, it is not intended to undermine the beautiful and appropriate use of ritual, including water baptism or communion with elements, as Christians follow Christ in their use. Our calling in this testimony is to point to Christ. If we are successful in highlighting the spiritual reality of Christ in our lives, the practice of other Christians who use these rituals should be enhanced by clarity and focus on the spiritual reality, not undermined. We desire that all Christians everywhere should experience the reality of Christ, and celebrate it as he may lead them.

Questions:

Q. Now that the historical context has changed, why don’t you just join with other Christians in using water baptism and celebrating communion with the elements?

A. When we’re in someone else’s church home, we often join with them in celebrating communion with the elements, as the Spirit leads. What we often see in the broader lightly-christianized society however, is continued confusion on what water baptism and the ritual of communion mean and imply.

How often have we been at a funeral where the relatives of the deceased are given false comfort with the words, “And we know that our dear loved one is with God in heaven today because he was baptized right here in this church” when the deceased showed no sign of following Christ at all in her or his everyday life? I’m often approached by those in the broader community who want the “assurance” (fire insurance?) they think they receive by being baptized in water, but who have no grasp of Jesus as Lord or any intention to pick up their cross daily to follow him. I vividly recall friends whose lives during the week were anything but holy explaining to me that they came to church to have their sins forgiven – meaning that they had no intention of stopping the sin! For these misguided souls, communion with the elements (and other outward rituals) were a false salve for their consciences.

It seems to me that there is plenty of need for our testimony and focus on spiritual realities, particularly given the patterns of thinking about ritual in human religions. Moreover, many Friends find that Christ is calling us to maintain our testimony on baptism and communion today. It’s a matter of obedience for us!

I want to say again, however, that many fine churches all over the world use the symbols of water baptism and communion with the elements in ways that highlight the spiritual realities involved and are a blessing to their members. We mean no disrespect by our testimony.

Q. Doesn’t Jesus tell his disciples to use the ritual of communion often in remembrance of him?

A. It seems more likely to us that since Jesus and his disciples were celebrating the Passover meal when he said those words, that he was putting a new meaning on the Passover celebration, identifying himself as the real Passover lamb. That is, he was instructing his disciples that from now on whenever they celebrate the Passover they should celebrate it in remembrance of him rather than establishing a new ritual.

Q. Are Christians told to use water baptism? Isn’t is disobedient to not use this symbol?

A. We don’t think so. We believe that when Jesus spoke of “baptism”, he was often using the word generically meaning immersion or washing, often in a spiritual sense, rather than speaking specifically of a ritual. When the New Testament is translated into English, the word for baptism is often used directly even though it has a pretty exclusively ritualistic meaning in English these days when the Greek word for which it is the translation was understood more generically. Let me say with unqualified enthusiasm that if I believed Jesus was telling me to be baptized in water that I’d be the first in the water; don’t get in my way! Quakers have always held up complete obedience to Christ as a practical, living ideal.

Q. Didn’t the early church baptize new believers in water?

A. Yes, they did. Water baptism was well-established as a Jewish conversion ritual and adapted by John as a pointed sign of the needed repentance for God’s chosen people leading up to the time of His Christ. It seems natural that early Christians would continue this Jewish ritual. On the other hand, there is no record of Jesus ever baptizing anyone in water. (See John 4:1-2.)

Q. Wasn’t Jesus baptized in water by John? If he did it, then shouldn’t we follow his example?

A. Jesus submitted to baptism in water by John as a sign of his identification with the Jewish people out of obedience to his Father. He needed no repentance for himself. As an observant Jew, Jesus also kept kosher, was circumcised, and followed all the Law of Moses. Does this imply that we should do the same?

Q. Can you give some examples of the use of the term “baptize” for something other than the ritual of water baptism?

A. John 1:33, Luke 3:16, Mark 10:38, Luke 12:50, Matthew 28:19, Mark 16:16. (OK, I admit that those last two can be argued another way. I included them on purpose, though, to make the point that Quakers interpret them as not referring to the ritual.)

Q. Don’t some modern Friends Churches use water baptism and communion with the elements pretty much like any other Evangelical church?

A. Yes. Different regions within Evangelical Friends International have different perspectives on what is the best practice today. In some regions, all or nearly all churches use these rituals. In others, none do. In others, it is left to the local church within certain guidelines.

Q. Where can I get more information?

A. You can read more about this topic in a statements from Friends Church Southwest. There is more historical information in the Brief Historical Introduction. You can also download our official Faith and Practice, which has more complete doctrinal statements, along with a lot of other stuff. The other EFCSW statements may also be of interest, Fervent Convictions has a brief section on baptism and communion.

Q. What about folks who attend churches where water baptism is practiced? Should they go ahead with water baptism at their church?

A. Under most conditions, I would say yes. In particular, there are times when people I have known find the idea of getting up in front of others and submitting to water baptism distasteful in some way. This is not what the Quaker testimony is about. If God is leading you into fellowship with a particular church as your church home, and they require water baptism, then that’s usually a good sign that you should be in unity with them in this practice. Of course, it is possible that God is leading you otherwise, but I’d be sure it was God and not one’s own preferences or feelings. We must obey God rather than men. And yet, if God is leading one to a church home, unity with that church’s theology and practice is very important. There’s nothing inherently sinful in symbolizing one’s faith in water baptism. There is something inherently sinful in willful rebellion against one’s church and its reasonable practices.

Four Reviews at Barclay Press

I reviewed four books a few years back. The reviews were done for Barclay Press, but are no longer available on the Barclay Press website (as of August, 2015). Having had some requests to be able to read them, I put them here. The four books are Social Justice Handbook: Small Steps from a Better World by Mae Elise Cannon, Welcoming Justice: God’s Movement Toward Beloved Community by Charles Marsh & John Perkins, Compassion, Justice, and the Christian Life: Rethinking Ministry to the Poor by Robert D. Lupton, and When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor – and Yourself by Steve Corbett & Brian Fikkert.

These four books all approach the issue of social justice. However, they are intended for very different audiences. Charles Marsh and John Perkins write to motivate. This book is intended as a call to Christians and churches to the social justice movement. It does this by telling stories and weaving a vision of the kingdom that Jesus announced. Because of this, it is also useful in gaining some historical appreciation.

Mae Elise Cannon writes to gather a wide range of useful information in one place so that it can be used by those who are seeking to increase awareness of social justice issues in their typical American church. It is full of references to other resources, a veritable tour guide of the social justice landscape in America.

Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert write for those who are convinced that they need to help the poor. It is a primer to convey best practice and ideas to practitioners in the hope that the same old mistakes that everyone seems to make can be avoided. Read this book if you are getting involved in ministry to the poor.

Robert Lupton writes out of his decades of experience in community building in Atlanta. The lessons he has learned are invaluable. This book is useful for practitioners and decision makers. It is also useful for Christians who want to understand why urban communities are often not happy with churches and service providers for the poor that locate in their neighborhoods.

All four are recommended for those to whom they are addressed. See my more detailed comments on each for more detailed information.

Compassion, Justice, and the Christian Life: Rethinking Ministry to the Poor
by Robert D. Lupton

This is a book about community development. It is not really a book about ministry to the poor as you may have experienced it. It is, in fact, a strong argument that community development is the best way to minister to the poor. The book distills practical lessons learned in the author’s experience at FCS Urban Ministries in Atlanta. Lupton is associated with Christian community development as practiced by CCDA organizations. (CCDA stands for Christian Community Development Association.) This book grew out of his efforts to explain the NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) attitude displayed by urban neighborhoods when a ministry desires to move in. Places where social services are offered and even churches (if they are commuter churches) are not necessarily assets in developing a community, from his perspective. Lupton explains that he is a community developer first and a social service provider second. He desires that Christians would advocate for both the community and the most vulnerable at the same time, finding a balance that serves the interests of both. It seems like this book is his attempt to say that, generally speaking, community development is the best social service that can be offered. (Those are my words; I don’t recall him ever saying it exactly that way.)

The book is organized in a logical fashion, laying groundwork in the earlier parts for the later parts. There are four main sections in the book following a forward by John Perkins and an introduction by the author; each section has several chapters. Each chapter is a very quick read, but deserves time for reflection, particularly if the concepts and ideas Lupton presents are new to you.

Part 1 – What’s Wrong with this Picture

There are tough issues to face when it comes to helping those called in scripture “the least of these.” Part one explores some of these issues and challenges assumptions that hinder a biblical approach. This part of the book establishes essential principles for working with the poor, giving the biblical basis for each.

The most unexpected chapter for some will be the chapter on community churches. Challenging the prevailing trend toward commuter churches, Lupton considers the impact such churches have on communities in which they locate and the greater loss of community in American society that is reflected in the church at large. The combination of practical experience and scriptural teaching is a powerful witness that should be heeded. “He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Part 2 – Is it Time to Consider a Change?

“Doing for others what they can do for themselves is charity at its worst.” This section explores how to serve those who are poor in ways that avoid damaging the poor and their community. A dominant theme of this part of the book is the idea of exchange. Exchange, as Lupton describes it, is a way of establishing dignity for those who are assisted by offering goods that help the poor in exchange for some sort of payment they can afford. In addition, by having an appropriate price, many common problems associated with giving away goods are avoided.

One chapter considers the merit of “doing good” in the form of various free types of assistance, and again compares these to mechanisms considered better by Lupton. In my experience, Lupton is surely on to something important when he says “when our feeding programs value order and efficiency over the messiness of personal involvement, good has become the enemy of best.” The idea of exchange and setting up systems of exchange promotes this ideal more effectively than giving things away, generally speaking.

Lupton includes a chapter in which he advocates the ideal of mixed income housing (as opposed to exclusively low-income housing), drawing from his own painful past experience. This is a foreshadowing of what he has to say in part 4. He goes on to describe instances of commuter churches that find themselves in conflict with the communities in which their facilities are located. Lupton disdains parking lots that are empty six days out of seven as a poor use of community real estate.

The last chapter in part 2 discusses the pitfalls of having a “servant attitude.” Too often, what is intended to be serving others is embodied in a form that says “I know better than you what you need.” It becomes “parental” (my word) or one-sided rather than embodying the ideal of exchange among partners with equal responsibilities to the community. Domination and control characterize the ragged death-dealing end of this spectrum of how it is possible to “serve.” Another dark side of “serving” is the commercialization of helping the poor. Lupton does not use this term, but here in my neighborhood certain “helpers” are known as the “homeless pimps.” This is the reputation one gains in the community when it is clear that one is helping others with the root motivation to gain financially for oneself.

In contrast, “Friends are people who know each other, who care, respect, struggle and are committed through time.” In friendship, “we” are in this together. Those called into the community by God form solidarity with the indigenous residents of the community, working together. I cannot begin to emphasize enough how important are the concepts taught in this section of the book for Christians who feel like they should get involved in working with the poor and broken. (For a fuller treatment of this issue, see When Helping Hurts.)

Part 3 – Toward Responsible Charity

This portion of Lupton’s book is key to his thinking; the introduction to it summarizes important ideas in just a few sentences. Quoting: “Everyone must pull his own weight. That is the key to responsible charity – which is not to say that everyone has equal capacity – just equal responsibility. When individuals, like communities, assume responsibility for their own destiny, when they abandon self-pity, self-indulgence and blame to face the hard work of building (or rebuilding) their lives, they have taken a giant step toward health.” The first chapter in Part 3 explains and amplifies these ideas, and the later chapters work out their implications in a process that leads to a community development paradigm. The strength of these chapters is in how Lupton walks the reader through the circumstances and reasoning from where everyone seems to start to end in understanding the need for development.

Part 4 – Final Thoughts

Part 4 takes up the topic of gentrification. “Gentrification with justice – that’s what is needed to restore health to our urban neighborhoods.” Gentrification, for those unsure of the term, is the trend toward moving into and restoring urban property by the middle-classes. It is a broad demographic movement of wealth back into the centers of U.S cities, re-making them in the pattern of most world cities, where wealth is concentrated in the center of the city and the poor are pushed to the periphery. Lupton views gentrification as the reality to be faced in American cities. What are the implications of gentrification for community development in the inner city?

Lupton believes gentrification is a trend that will come and that cannot be resisted. His reaction? Make the best of it. Even more, he believes that the influx of new residents with means and education is necessary to rebuild inner-city communities. He may be right, though I am attracted to a paradigm of community-building from within. The problem with my preferred approach is that gentrification is a trend that gives every appearance of building steam, give or take a recession or two. Start making an inner city neighborhood safer and better to live in, and people will move in from outside. Lupton’s acceptance of the new reality and advice on how to live and work justly in the new gentrification environment is invaluable, whether I like the phenomenon or not!

Lupton does more than submit to gentrification, however. He also offers good advice on how to work for justice in the face of this new reality. Those looking at the future of ministry to the poor should, I believe, pay careful attention. The face of inner-city ministry is changing and will change much more in the years ahead. How should Christians work for justice as gentrification takes place? This section of the book is a good resource from someone with long experience, intellectual capacity, and a desire to be faithful. As usual, Lupton is not just talking theory; he’s speaking from hard-won experience and the perspective gained from past mistakes.

Lupton closes his writing with a challenge to the entrepreneurs and business leaders among Christians. Good! And yet… there is something that bothers me in this. I’ve learned from experience and had confirmed to me through my interaction with other CCDA practitioners the value of building a community over time with some influx of people called to the work, but more importantly through building up the indigenous young generation over time to be the core of the new, developing community. I treasure this idea as a practical reality! In this challenge I perceive an edge of “they can’t do it without you” that goes down like dry dust. But don’t let that keep you from this book.

I suppose, being a Quaker from long-time Quaker roots that the utopian ideal of building a new and just community came in my DNA. Quakers in the U.S. have a long history of moving (mostly westward) and starting new communities: building towns and schools. Let’s get it right this time! The ironic truth is that this has mostly been accomplished by people moving to an area for a new community. However, my call has been to build a new community in the inner city, raising up a new generation of leaders as the foundation for that community. The thought of materialistic “heathens” from the ‘burbs moving in and messing with that community is not a thought I relish. (How selfish is that? Pretty selfish, I suppose. Thank God He is in charge.)

Lupton’s book embodies so much valuable hands-on experience at community development that ignoring the lessons he has learned would be foolish in the extreme. And yet, it seems to me that there is a focus on the techniques and idea of development that leaves some important relational realities unaddressed. This criticism is, I think, more a reflection of what I value than any failed intention of Robert D. Lupton. Lupton does a great job of introducing the essential ideas and gives them good traction through real-life examples. Please read this book if you are thinking of getting involved in ministry to the poor, particularly if you will be working as a community developer.

Be warned. The temptation for those new to this type of work may well be to jump right to the final stage of development. Lupton describes a process that starts by moving into a community and working in fairly traditional ways and eventually led to a community development approach. I do not believe this is an accident. There is a learning process that not just the incoming workers in a new location go through, but that a community must go through. Surely there is benefit to knowing the destination before you start the journey; but knowing the destination does not substitute for the journey. I am learning the virtue of allowing those whom God has called to a work to go through the stages of learning that lead to mature ministry. There is no need to take what we know to be a mistaken approach or let others make obvious mistakes. There is, however, a need to work in a community and earn trust and establish context and understanding and trust through which the more difficult tasks of community development can be undertaken. Sometimes that trust is earned by allowing the learning process to take its natural course.

The last section of the book is an appendix in which is reprinted a CCDA article by Wayne Gordon. Gordon is another leader with decades of experience in faithful obedience to a call from God to an impoverished community in Lawndale, Illinois. Lawndale is on Chicago’s west side, and has now reached legendary status in Christian community development circles. Read this section of the book. Digest it. Read it again. Get the audio from a CCDA conference workshop where Wayne Gordon or John Perkins explains these principles and listen to it. They are right on target! This is vital information.

The title of the appendix is The Eight Components of Christian Community Development. The eight components are:
1. Relocation: Living Among the People
2. Reconciliation: to God, to People
3. Redistribution
4. Leadership Development
5. Listening to Community
6. Church-based Community Development
7. A Wholistic Approach
8. Empowerment

You can guess at the fleshed out explanation of the components from their titles, but don’t. Take time to study this core philosophy of Christian Community Development. It has been developed through decades of experience and serious engagement with Jesus’ teaching. The information in this appendix article is also available online at the CCDA website. CCDA is the organization that brings together the best Christian practitioners in this area of ministry.

When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor – and Yourself
by Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert

Who should read this book? This book is written for those who are preparing to do something about poverty. It is not a “call to arms.” So, if you want to be convinced of the need to do something, look elsewhere. If that works for you and you become motivated, then come back to this one! This book is written in response to the armies of Christians marching out to “do something about poverty” at home and abroad. Often, these efforts end up hurting those who go and those they intend to help. Let me make the premise perfectly clear: well-meaning, highly-committed, highly-motivated, Bible-believing Christians jump into efforts intended to help those in poverty and end up hurting themselves and those they intended to help. If you question that premise, this book is for you. If you know that this premise to be true, and want some practical help making sure that you actually help others in need, this book is for you.

The book opens with a forward by John Perkins, founder of CCDA. The forward is followed by an introduction that explains how to use the book and gives references to other materials and resources.

The book is written specifically for “North American congregations” who are getting increasingly involved with poverty alleviation and who are often without experience in wise practice. Corbett and Fikkert point out that the methods often used by North Americans to alleviate poverty actually make worse the situation of those that we intend to help.

The main body of the book consists of three parts:
1. Foundational Concepts for Helping without Hurting
2. General Principles for Helping without Hurting
3. Practical Strategies for Helping without Hurting

Each part consists of three chapters. Each chapter includes an exercise to be done before reading it and another to be done after reading it; there are also some extended exercises between chapters. This is a great book to use in a class or small group setting. It is not intended to be read quickly. Rather, it should be read over an extended time, carefully considering as they are presented the concepts and approaches necessary to help alleviate poverty without hurting those we intend to help. Working through this book with others to promote discussion would be ideal.

In part one, Corbett and Fikkert establish foundational concepts. To start: Why did Jesus come to earth? The authors consider the answer given by 99% of evangelicals and contrast it with what Jesus had to say about himself and his mission. This is a core issue that leads to a consideration of the mission of the church. The rest of the book rests on how this question is answered, and answering this question is an exercise for the first chapter. The result, biblically speaking: There should be no poor among you.

Continuing their war on poverty alleviation ignorance, Corbett and Fikkert ask: “What is poverty?” Ask the poor, and you get a different answer than if you ask those with resources and wealth. The difference is telling, and has deep implications for efforts to alleviate poverty. “Shame, inferiority, powerlessness, humiliation, fear, hopelessness, depression, social isolation, voicelessness” – these are the words used by poor people to describe what poverty is like. Those in poverty experience a loss of self-determination, meaning, purpose, and hope. Ask a North American, even one involved in efforts to alleviate poverty, and you will nearly always hear a very different answer. Hmmm. Seems like a problem.

Taking Bryant Myers’ model for the fundamental realities embodied in persons created by a relational God, the authors explain a biblical framework for understanding poverty in terms of one’s relationships with God, oneself, others, and the rest of creation. Because of the Fall, these relationships are broken. Poverty is the result of these broken relationships; the absence of shalom in all of its fullness. For poverty to be alleviated, the broken relationships must be addressed. This book is intended to be worked through in sequence, its wisdom discovered and processed through interaction with others, contrasting preconceptions with the insight brought to bear by the authors as one works through its pages. It would not be a service to readers for me to give out samples of the hard-found wisdom embodied in this book in a way that undermined this process. Yet samples at a big-box warehouse store are intended to whet one’s appetite for the whole package, so to that end we will turn.

It is a major premise of this book that those who attempt to work with low-income people without realizing their own brokenness will do more harm than good. Any sense of superiority or reaching down from on high to help the lowly poor will result in harm to oneself and harm to those one is attempting to help. This reviewer will go so far as to question the whole idea of “help” as though some humans had the upper hand over others – this upper hand being demonstrated by one’s economic status. Those of us who are rich often come with a “god complex” to which we are blind – deceived by the evil one. We increase the sense of inferiority and shame endemic to poverty with our “I am superior” attitude. I literally shudder at how easily we fall into this self-deception! The result of approaching relationship in this way is harm to oneself and to others.

What to do? Fortunately, this book goes a long way toward helping to increase awareness of these problems. The real-life examples that are analyzed for more than “feel good” moments are very good, and well-presented. The authors understand the problems of hurting more than helping quite well and present them in a very effective manner. Please read this book if you are considering an effort to alleviate poverty and are not already well-versed in these issues. Let me say again: be really sure you understand what the authors of this book are trying to convey before you harm yourself and others in your poverty-alleviation effort.

The rest of the book lays out general principles and practical strategies for helping without hurting. These principles are good, time-tested, and will hold up in real life. I highly recommend this book. In fact, I have given away so many copies to my friends who are engaged in this sort of work that I’ve had a hard time keeping my hands on a copy long enough to complete this review! There are a lot of books out there, but I know of no other book that will serve as a better introduction to these concepts and get you started more accurately in a good direction. No book will substitute for experience, and you will make mistakes anyway, but if you heed the teaching of this book you will make fewer mistakes and learn more quickly.

So, is the book perfect? No. There is a tendency to almost a legalism about avoiding certain types of action that might make even cast Jesus as a “law-breaker” if taken too literally. Nearly every “rule of thumb” that I’ve ever been given for working with the poor is broken by someone who works effectively with the poor. Those in this book, though well-motivated, are no different. The concepts are right on target. The problems they identify are real, and pressing. The principles for application are excellent. However, they are not a substitute for Jesus’ heart and an active desire to glorify God as you communicate his love to other human beings. I’m sure the authors would say they never intended the principles they teach as such a substitute. Yes. It’s just so very easy to believe that we have this all figured out and thereby start yet another sort of “god complex.” It’s easy to be about being effective at “helping” and skip the vital relationships through which life flows – both ways.

I have this one little part of my soul that still aches after reading recent books on poverty, compassion, and helping – including this one. The trend these days is to take a pretty strong position on the idea of development as being superior to relief. That is entirely understandable, correct – even commendable. I support this trend. We as humans and we as the church have erred in this so many times and for so long, bringing relief in a way that hurts those in poverty when development is needed, that serious corrective action is needed. I see the terrible results of this daily. And yet… there are those who will not be helped by development efforts that are economically justified. There are those so broken that one must pour out hundreds of hours of love and dignity to maybe see just a glimmer of hope. Even then, the prospect of a “return” on one’s “investment” seems dim. (See how evil we are, that we think in these terms?) Who we really are in Christ is revealed by how we handle relationships in which we have nothing to gain. Do we do what we do to get credit for a good deed or to feel good about how much difference we have made? The hard truth is that there are some who are unlikely to be restored to anything resembling wholeness and Shalom in this life. It’s easy to be caught up in visibly helping when you can see that you have made a difference, because it is rewarding. What about those other times – those other people? “I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.”

I don’t think the authors of the book would disagree with what I write; I intend not criticism of the book but a warning against a particular attitude. I suppose that is a subject for a different time. If you’re going to get involved in helping to alleviate poverty at home or abroad, study this book first. Please.

Welcoming Justice: God’s Movement Toward Beloved Community
by Charles Marsh & John Perkins

Who should read this book? Christians. This book is a “call to arms” for the church, advocating that the church embrace justice as essential to the gospel of Jesus Christ. It is written in the form of alternating chapters by the two authors, each following and building on what the other has written in the preceding chapter.

1. Charles Marsh – The Unfinished Business of the Civil Rights Movement

In this chapter, Marsh sets the scene. He gives a very brief historical introduction to the civil rights movement, detailing its roots as a Christian movement. However, by 1964, the Christian foundation and essence of the movement seemed to be forgotten. The church was left behind; the spiritual vision of a redeemed society no longer seen as relevant. The remainder of this first chapter introduces John Perkins and his vision of creating beloved community. Marsh explains the “three R’s” of Relocation, Redistribution, and Reconciliation, which formed the basis of Perkins vision. (Another five principles have been added to Perkin’s original three in more recent formulations from the Christian Community Development Association, which Perkins founded.)

2. John Perkins – The Cultural Captivity of the Church

Having grown up in Mississippi, witnessed his brother’s murder, and been tortured by racist white law enforcement officers, John Perkins tells the story of going back to Mendenhall, Mississippi in response to God’s call. Perkins tells of a white pastor friend who committed suicide after his church rejected his plans to work with Perkins.

“That’s when I started to realize that the church had become captive to our culture. We’d taken the good news of God’s love that’s supposed to burn through racial and social divisions and turned it into a religion that reinforced the status quo. That’s the Christianity we’ve inherited in this country, and that what our missionaries have gone around the world preaching. We’ve over-evangelized the world too lightly, and the church has reinforced America’s problems more than we’ve given people reason to believe in something new. I started to see that in a little town in Mississippi forty years ago, and I’ve spent the rest of my life trying to preach a gospel that burns through racial and cultural barriers and reconciles people to God and one another.”

Perkins was called to preach the good news – to white people! Taking up the story, Perkins explains the effects of oppression upon black communities in America. Then, in a truly prophetic turn, Perkins explains that no one ever puts a chain on another human being without “attaching the other end to themselves.” He tells a story about a white leader told him how far we’ve come in reconciliation because his church had invited a black man to preach for the first time. Perkins: “You ought to be ashamed. After more than a hundred years your church has finally found a black man you’ll accept, and you want me to be happy about it?”

Perkins believes that discipleship must include reconciliation as an essential component.

3. Charles Marsh – The Power of True Conversion

In this chapter, Marsh tells something of his story. Marsh comes from white roots in Mississippi – the other side of the tracks from Perkins, so to speak. In 1980, after college in Massachusetts, Marsh returned south and through a sequence of events was exposed to Perkins’ writing. He arranged to meet Perkins. In a random act of reaching out in love, Perkins sends a batch of blueberries from his garden to Marsh’s grandmother, about whose racial views Marsh had been embarrassed. Through this simple act of kindness extended to his grandmother, Marsh was drawn into Perkin’s vision.

From relating this experience, Marsh moves to a call for the church to live the compelling love of Christ. “Most of my students who have left the faith have left because they have listened to Christians in hope of hearing beautiful songs and have instead heard something thin and shrill.” Ouch. Marsh seeks to spur us on towards love in action, crossing the barriers that divide us. “The existence of a compelling Christian witness in our time does not depend on our access to the White House, the size of our churches or the cultural relevance of our pastors. It depends, instead, on our ability to sing better songs with our lives.”

4. John Perkins – The Next Great Awakening

Perkins hits his stride in this chapter – and what a stride it is to behold! He begins: “The job of an evangelist is to connect God’s good news with people’s deep yearnings.” He builds. “To preach the gospel of Jesus Christ today, we’ve got to invite people into authentic relationships where they can be restored to a beloved community and work for the common good.” As Perkins preached the good news of reconciliation in one body to God and one another through Christ, I could almost hear the heavenly choir! Perkins, with the natural flow of an accomplished artist, wings his words into an invitingly beautiful tapestry revealing God’s heart for authentic relationships and community. Jesus “has destroyed every barrier, the dividing wall of hostility.”

After an inspiring start, Perkins draws the reader into considering Jesus’ call to “follow me.” This naturally flows into considering Jesus’ model for leadership development and a call to love one another – just as Jesus said. You really must read this book, if only for this chapter; this is the core of Perkin’s thought. I don’t suggest reading only this chapter, because it is set in an important context established by the first three chapters. I can’t say that I learned new information. But oh, the beauty of the vision Perkins sets out! It was affirming and energizing and encouraging. Inspiring!

The chapter continues with specific examples that Perkins wants to share. The examples are good, but the magic for me was in the vision spun over the first pages. If this vision excites and inspires you, then you may be cut out for ministry at the front lines in our diverse American culture – the ministry of reconciliation among the poor across the dividing lines of our society. Thank you, God, for this prophetic vision that you have given to John Perkins. Of course, as with any vision truly from our God, there are others who share it. I think it was first fleshed out for me, from the beginning yearnings that God gave, when I met and grew to know Fred Newkirk. Marsh quotes Henri de Lubac’s description of the effect saints have on us: “All of the sudden the universe seems different; it is the stage of a vast drama, and we, at its heart, are compelled to play our part.”

5. Charles Marsh – God’s Movement in the Twenty-First Century

In this chapter, Marsh attempts to build substantively on the foundation established by Perkins in chapter 4. His rehearsal of the hopes and dreams of a new generation of students and workers is competent and useful. It follows the pattern set by Perkins. However, for me, the magic captured in Perkin’s chapter evaporated. Though many signs of God’s movement in this time are listed, the descriptions seem generic, and the engaging nature of the personal stories from the earlier chapters is lost.

There are three ideas that Marsh seeks to promote in this chapter. The first is a richer understanding of the church (echoing Perkins in chapter 4). Perhaps I’ve read too many articles forecasting the soon-to-be global majority of non-white, non-Western Christians. There’s nothing particularly wrong here; but neither is anything said that isn’t said better elsewhere.

The second idea is the idea of deeper contemplation and silence. While these are familiar and valued concepts to anyone conversant in Quaker practice and thought, it was unclear how this idea flows from what came before it. I don’t doubt that this thread can be woven into the themes of this book. There are hints, most clearly in the idea of people being “fed up with words,” which can easily be linked to Perkin’s call in chapter 4. However, the connections are not clearly drawn. Instead, Marsh launches into a contemplative ideologue and leaves it to the reader to figure out what this has to do with Perkins’ call to action in addition to belief.

The third idea Marsh calls “a bolder humility.” This idea meanders into a call to the peaceable kingdom. Again, from a Quaker perspective… of course! But where did we lose all that energy that came from John Perkins tying into our deepest yearnings? Something went off track here; the compelling case is not made. The momentum of the personal stories leading to deep conviction in the gospel of Jesus Christ has dissipated.

6. John Perkins – A Time for Rebuilding

From the writing of the prophet Zechariah, whom he says “understands the problems of my neighborhood,” Perkins expounds on the specifics of what needs to be rebuilt among the poor in America. He begins with broken families. He takes on the “homogeneous unit principle.” He claims that churches have decided to outsource justice; that they are only concerned about justice “out there” somewhere – a place where one goes on a short-term mission trip, but not a part of the church’s community. He relates economic justice to peace, and challenges us to consider what the church has to offer a community in which healthy men beg on the corners. He takes on prisons and the prosperity gospel.

The contribution Perkins brings in this chapter is to highlight the fact that God has constructed the world in a certain way. If we do things according God’s plan, the problems we see will go away “naturally,” so to speak. But we do not. Perkins is not without hope even in the face of a world gone awry. There is always a remnant! And that is all we need.

Perkins eventually gets around to calling the church to develop community, which culminates in the development of leaders in place from that community; this is standard Christian community development philosophy. “Outsiders” are often called to be a part of this process, but fundamentally “indigenous leadership” must be grown over an extended period of time. In a longish list of ideas that need to be taken seriously, this is a fundamental concept, and a fitting capstone to the chapter and the book, ending where those familiar with Perkins know that he stands. I can speak from personal experience that commitment to this idea is fundamental to success in building the blessed community where there is none. There are no shortcuts.

This book is more about inspiration and story than nuts and bolts; Marsh and Perkins excel at telling the story and inspiring. When they get into nuts and bolts, the results are uneven. So, read this book for some personal context and inspiration. Turn to other books such as Compassion, Justice, and the Christian Life: Rethinking Ministry to the Poor by Robert D. Lupton or When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor – and Yourself by Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert for nuts and bolts.

Social Justice Handbook: Small Steps from a Better World
by Mae Elise Cannon

Micah 6:8
He has shown all you people what is good.
And what does the LORD require of you?
To act justly and to love mercy,
and to walk humbly with your God.

Who should read this book? This book is written for those desiring to increase awareness of social justice issues in a typical American church of the majority culture. It is not a serious how-to book for those already engaged in social justice ministry or those getting started in working with the poor. It is oriented toward being a powerful resource for Christians who are starting to build awareness of and action for social justice in American churches. In this, it succeeds. Mae Elise Cannon has done a great service in gathering information for those who are walking this path after her. Think of this book as sort of a tourist’s guide to social justice. For those who already live in the area, it may still be useful in finding unexplored areas and for having collected many references in one place. But its real utility is for those newly exploring.

Cannon’s book grew out of the author’s experience in ministry focused on social justice at Willow Creek Community Church and Hillside Covenant Church. After meeting with many ministry leaders involved in social justice, Cannon was pushed into a personal struggle with the practical issues of how to go about pursuing social justice and biblical justice. She compiled what she was learning in these areas and this book is the result. She considers this book to be “Social Justice 101” – fundamentals rather than comprehensive coverage. Cannon intends her perspective on social justice to be rooted in scripture – a faithful Christian approach to putting biblical belief into action where we live. Here again, she succeeds.

The book is also intended to be a call to action for the church; not simply a theoretical consideration of the issues. However, I found it to be less effective as a call to action than as a reference tool. The facts are there – and one might hope that this is enough to serve as an effective call to action. History says otherwise. Cannon lacks the punch of John Perkin’s in building an effective call to action. She is younger and more concerned about avoiding offense than Perkins; her concern to retain credibility within the evangelical establishment seems palpable. To her credit, she says the right things; but Perkins, at his advanced age and level of experience, can tell the stories and draw the inevitable conclusions that will ruffle feathers. From where I sit, those feathers need to be ruffled. Isaiah or Ezekiel would have said it more like Perkins!

Let’s get into the structure of the book. The three-page table of contents at the front of the book is excellent, and essential. It lists all the chapters and articles, including the small topical articles scattered throughout the book.

The first portion of the book is intended to be an introduction to social and biblical justice from a Christian perspective. It is a chapter by chapter progression establishing a general foundation. Chapter one does a credible job at providing biblical underpinnings to a social justice theology. Chapter two establishes definitions and argues that much effort spent on compassion (effects) would better be spent on social justice (causes). There is an extended discussion of various aspects of justice.

Chapter three is historical background, considering events significant to understanding social justice in the Americas. The coverage is useful but very basic and somewhat uneven. Significant chapters of Christian engagement in social justice go unmentioned while some included examples seem, well, a bit of a reach. (Example: The hospitality of Pilgrim communities is considered significant; but the Holy Experiment in Pennsylvania and peaceful living with native Americans goes unmentioned? One wonders when Quakers are hardly mentioned in a survey of social justice issues in America. John Woolman?) The story of Christian involvement in social justice in America is richer than it is here portrayed. On the other hand, much useful information is gathered together in an accessible resource.

Chapter four is about the process of promoting transformation of apathetic Christians to become “agents of justice.” There are some good, practical suggestions for those coming from a well-educated and privileged American cultural perspective, and some exhortation for others. The clinical approach Cannon takes provides accurate information; however, inspiration for change is better found elsewhere. Even so, this chapter is helpful to those seeking to establish social justice as a priority. Cannon identifies nine components that help Christians to move to advocacy: prayer, awareness, lament, repentance, partnership and community, sacrifice, advocacy, evangelism, and celebration. She gives significant consideration to issues of “partnering with humility” and paternalism in this chapter, introducing these important concepts clearly and cogently.

Chapter five is about solutions to injustice. Whose job is it to bring social justice, anyway? In this chapter, Cannon considers personal, church, and government involvement in social justice in a perfunctory manner, noting how Christians can take responsibility themselves and cooperate with others.

Scattered throughout the book are small, well-placed articles to spice up the reading. These articles include profiles of people involved in social justice, ideas on how to raise awareness of the issues, and exercises for spiritual reflection to consider how God is calling the reader to respond to what they are learning. In addition, there are many references to other resources for further research scattered through the text of the book.

The second portion of the book is a sort of encyclopedia of many social justice issues. This part of the book is intended to be an easy reference for those wanting an introduction to certain social justice issues. There are over 130 pages of brief background articles, each with references to additional resources. Each article provides suggestions to begin thinking and acting for justice on the topic it covers.

Of course, there is more coverage of some social justice issues than others. For example, there is little mention of oppression directed at immigrants and those working for immigration reform, or of the injustice that results from the morass of conflicting and confusing immigration laws. There are dedicated Christians working for social justice in this area. One might be tempted to think this omission could reflect a desire to avoid controversy; but consider that Cannon includes an article strongly advocating that women should not be limited in the use of their gifts in the home, workplace, or church. So we’ll have to chalk up the lack of coverage of immigration issues to something else. It would be hard not to leave something out!

After the second portion of the book, there are several very useful appendices giving lists of resources. These include lists of organizations, books, documentaries and unrated movies, and mainstream movies which are useful in exploring or introducing the social justice issues introduced by the book.

Overall, this is a fine book and a great resource for Christians concerned about getting involved in social justice. It is a fine “tour guide” for those gaining exposure to the many areas of social justice covered, and a fine reference work for ministry leaders.

What about those links?

Well, being a famous online shopper, people ask me where to get stuff. So here are a few links to online vendors that I use. I don’t use that many these days, having found that these vendors hit the low-price and reliability combination that I want. I sometimes shop elsewhere online, but the list of next tier vendors is long and I’m too lazy to enter all those sites into my link area. Ask me if you want other references.

If you want high-quality Christian teaching on audio, look no further than the classes and seminars at the Regent College Bookstore. (That’s the one in Vancouver, BC.) Every class I’ve bought and listened to has been good to excellent. No losers yet. I’m particularly glad to have discovered Rikk Watts’ classes.

And then there are the podcasts. I listen to a few very regularly. I never miss Planet Money, because, well, these days it’s all about the economy and I can understand what they say on this podcast – they explain the jargon when guest experts use it.

I also greatly like This American Life, but can’t keep up. It’s creative and real and interesting. It’s often entertaining.

I started listening to Prairie Home Companion back in 1980! The News from Lake Wobegon doesn’t have quite the same kick it used to, but old friends are comforting, and Susie loves it.

Mars Hill Audio is a resource every thinking christian should know about. Ken Myers does a great job of keeping us up to date on intellectual trends we need to know about to keep up with what’s going on in thinking society. Subscribe to the audio Journal; they need our support.

I’ve always been fascinated by history, and the Hardcore History podcast gives me a fix every month or two that really charges my neurons. Dan Carlin, the podcaster, also does a more political podcast called Common Sense that is bound to offend almost everyone some of the time and make you think most of the time. I sometimes listen to it, but haven’t made it a priority listen.

You can probably figure out why I have the other links listed. This is left as an exercise for the reader.

« Older posts Newer posts »